Duron 850 vs EPYC 7501

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7501 and Duron 850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking387not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.93no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Duron
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)K7 (2000−2003)
Release date29 June 2017 (6 years ago)14 May 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,400no data
Current price$900 (0.3x MSRP)$14

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7501 and Duron 850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads641
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz0.85 GHz
Bus supportno data200 MT/s
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)64 KB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm180 nm
Die size192 mm2105.68 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million25 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7501 and Duron 850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketTR4no data
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7501 and Duron 850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7501 and Duron 850 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7501 and Duron 850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelno data
Maximum memory size2 TiB4 GB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7501 and Duron 850.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 June 2017 14 May 2001
Physical cores 32 1
Threads 64 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 25 Watt

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7501 and Duron 850. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 7501 is a server/workstation processor while Duron 850 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7501 and Duron 850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7501
EPYC 7501
AMD Duron 850
Duron 850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 7501 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Duron 850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7501 or Duron 850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.