AMD-K5-PR90ABQ vs EPYC 7501
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 7501 and AMD-K5-PR90ABQ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 452 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.12 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD EPYC | AMD K5 |
| Power efficiency | 8.72 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Naples (2017−2018) | K5 (1996−1997) |
| Release date | 20 June 2017 (7 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,400 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7501 and AMD-K5-PR90ABQ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 0.09 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 60 MT/s |
| Multiplier | 20 | 1.5 |
| L1 cache | 3 MB | no data |
| L2 cache | 16 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 350 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 161 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 19200 Million | 4 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7501 and AMD-K5-PR90ABQ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | TR4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 155 W, 170 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7501 and AMD-K5-PR90ABQ. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7501 and AMD-K5-PR90ABQ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7501 and AMD-K5-PR90ABQ. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | 4 GB |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 170.671 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7501 and AMD-K5-PR90ABQ.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 32 | 1 |
| Threads | 64 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 350 nm |
EPYC 7501 has 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between EPYC 7501 and AMD-K5-PR90ABQ. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 7501 is a server/workstation processor while AMD-K5-PR90ABQ is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
