Performance per price, higher is better.
Intel Xeon E7-8895 v2 vs AMD EPYC 74F3
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
General info
Comparing EPYC 74F3 and Xeon E7-8895 v2 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance rating | 32 | 39 |
Value for money | 3.52 | 100.00 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
Architecture codename | Milan (2021) | no data |
Release date | 12 January 2021 (2 years old) | 1 January 2014 (9 years old) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,900 | no data |
Current price | $5794 (2x MSRP) | $45 |
Technical specs
EPYC 74F3 and Xeon E7-8895 v2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 15 (Pentadeca-Core) |
Threads | 48 | 30 |
Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
L1 cache | 96K (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | no data |
L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 37.5 MB |
Chip lithography | 7 nm+ | 22 nm |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 67 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 74F3 and Xeon E7-8895 v2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 8 |
Socket | SP3 | no data |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 240 Watt | 155 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 74F3 and Xeon E7-8895 v2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
TSX | no data | - |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
PAE | no data | 46 Bit |
Instruction Replay | no data | - |
Security technologies
EPYC 74F3 and Xeon E7-8895 v2 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 74F3 and Xeon E7-8895 v2 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | no data |
VT-d | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 74F3 and Xeon E7-8895 v2. Depending on the motherboards, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600 |
Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | 1.5 TB |
Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.795 GB/s | 85 GB/s |
ECC memory support | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 74F3 and Xeon E7-8895 v2.
PCIe version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 32 |
Benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- Passmark
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 67%
EPYC 74F3 outperforms Xeon E7-8895 v2 by 6% in Passmark.
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating | 48.07 | 45.35 |
Recency | 12 January 2021 | 1 January 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 4000 | 0 |
Base clock speed | 2800 | 0 |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 22 nm |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 240 Watt | 155 Watt |
Technical City couldn't decide between
and
The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 74F3 and Xeon E7-8895 v2, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.