Ryzen 9 7900X3D vs EPYC 74F3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 74F3
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 240 Watt
39.22
+20.4%
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
2023
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
32.57

EPYC 74F3 outperforms Ryzen 9 7900X3D by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 74F3 and Ryzen 9 7900X3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking66111
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.1798.73
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Ryzen 9
Architecture codenameMilan (2021)Raphael
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,900no data
Current price$2990 (1x MSRP)$339

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 7900X3D has 711% better value for money than EPYC 74F3.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 74F3 and Ryzen 9 7900X3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads4824
Base clock speed2.8 GHz4.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+5 nm, 6 nm
Die size4x 81 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistors33,200 million13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 74F3 and Ryzen 9 7900X3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3AM5
Power consumption (TDP)240 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 74F3 and Ryzen 9 7900X3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 74F3 and Ryzen 9 7900X3D are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 74F3 and Ryzen 9 7900X3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size4 TiB128 GB
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 74F3 and Ryzen 9 7900X3D.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes12824

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 74F3 39.22
+20.4%
Ryzen 9 7900X3D 32.57

EPYC 74F3 outperforms Ryzen 9 7900X3D by 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 74F3 60666
+20.4%
Ryzen 9 7900X3D 50381

EPYC 74F3 outperforms Ryzen 9 7900X3D by 20% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.22 32.57
Recency 15 March 2021 4 January 2023
Physical cores 24 12
Threads 48 24
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 240 Watt 120 Watt

The EPYC 74F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 7900X3D in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 74F3 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 7900X3D is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 74F3 and Ryzen 9 7900X3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 74F3
EPYC 74F3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 74F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 230 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7900X3D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 74F3 or Ryzen 9 7900X3D, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.