EPYC 9554 vs EPYC 74F3

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

EPYC 74F3
2021
24 cores / 48 threads
39.23
EPYC 9554
2022
64 cores / 128 threads
72.18
+84%

EPYC 9554 outperforms EPYC 74F3 by 84% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 74F3 and EPYC 9554 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking646
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.2716.21
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameMilan (2021)Genoa
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,900$9,087
Current price$5571 (1.9x MSRP)$2590 (0.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9554 has 208% better value for money than EPYC 74F3.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 74F3 and EPYC 9554 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads48128
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.75 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+5 nm, 6 nm
Die size4x 81 mm28x 72 mm2
Number of transistors33,200 million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 74F3 and EPYC 9554 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP3SP5
Power consumption (TDP)240 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 74F3 and EPYC 9554. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 74F3 and EPYC 9554 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 74F3 and EPYC 9554. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size4 TiB6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 74F3 and EPYC 9554.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 74F3 39.23
EPYC 9554 72.18
+84%

EPYC 9554 outperforms EPYC 74F3 by 84% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 74F3 60666
EPYC 9554 111635
+84%

EPYC 9554 outperforms EPYC 74F3 by 84% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.23 72.18
Recency 15 March 2021 10 November 2022
Physical cores 24 64
Threads 48 128
Cost $2900 $9087
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 240 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9554 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 74F3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 74F3 and EPYC 9554, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 74F3
EPYC 74F3
AMD EPYC 9554
EPYC 9554

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 74F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

This processor has no user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9554 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 74F3 or EPYC 9554, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.