Ultra 9 386H vs EPYC 74F3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking124not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.11no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency15.36no data
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)no data
Release date15 March 2021 (4 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$2,900no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 74F3 and Core Ultra 9 386H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads48no data
Base clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.9 GHz
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache256 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm+no data
Die size4x 81 mm2no data
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 74F3 and Core Ultra 9 386H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP3no data
Power consumption (TDP)240 Watt + 18 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 74F3 and Core Ultra 9 386H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 74F3 and Core Ultra 9 386H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 74F3 and Core Ultra 9 386H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200no data
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 74F3 and Core Ultra 9 386H.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 24 16

EPYC 74F3 has 50% more physical cores.

We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 74F3 and Intel Core Ultra 9 386H. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 74F3 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 9 386H is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 74F3
EPYC 74F3
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Core Ultra 9 386H

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 74F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 9 386H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 74F3 and Core Ultra 9 386H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.