Ultra 7 155U vs EPYC 74F3

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 74F3
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 240 Watt
38.92
+262%
Core Ultra 7 155U
2023
12 cores / 14 threads, 15 Watt
10.75

EPYC 74F3 outperforms Core Ultra 7 155U by a whopping 262% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 74F3 and Core Ultra 7 155U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking78733
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.55no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Meteor Lake-U
Power efficiency15.0666.56
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Meteor Lake-P (2023)
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,900$490

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 74F3 and Core Ultra 7 155U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads4814
Base clock speed2.8 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.8 GHz
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+Intel 4 nm
Die size4x 81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data110 °C
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 74F3 and Core Ultra 7 155U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3FCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)240 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 74F3 and Core Ultra 7 155U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT

Security technologies

EPYC 74F3 and Core Ultra 7 155U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 74F3 and Core Ultra 7 155U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 74F3 and Core Ultra 7 155U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiB96 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.95 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 74F3 and Core Ultra 7 155U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by EPYC 74F3 and Core Ultra 7 155U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 74F3 and Core Ultra 7 155U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 74F3 and Core Ultra 7 155U.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes12812
PCI supportno data4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 74F3 38.92
+262%
Ultra 7 155U 10.75

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 74F3 60666
+262%
Ultra 7 155U 16760

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.92 10.75
Recency 15 March 2021 14 December 2023
Physical cores 24 12
Threads 48 14
Power consumption (TDP) 240 Watt 15 Watt

EPYC 74F3 has a 262% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 242.9% more threads.

Ultra 7 155U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 1500% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 74F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 7 155U in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 74F3 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 155U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 74F3 and Core Ultra 7 155U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 74F3
EPYC 74F3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155U
Core Ultra 7 155U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 74F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 70 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 155U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 74F3 or Core Ultra 7 155U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.