Apple M4 Max (16 cores) vs EPYC 7473X

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7473X
2022
24 cores / 48 threads, 240 Watt
37.32
+33.4%
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2024
16 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
27.97

EPYC 7473X outperforms Apple M4 Max (16 cores) by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7473X and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking85168
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M4
Power efficiency14.7229.41
Architecture codenameMilan-X (2022)no data
Release date22 March 2022 (2 years ago)30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7473X and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads4816
Base clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.51 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache768 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm3 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2no data
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7473X and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP3no data
Power consumption (TDP)240 Watt90 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7473X and Apple M4 Max (16 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7473X and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7473X and Apple M4 Max (16 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M4 40-core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7473X and Apple M4 Max (16 cores).

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.32 27.97
Recency 22 March 2022 30 October 2024
Physical cores 24 16
Threads 48 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 240 Watt 90 Watt

EPYC 7473X has a 33.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Apple M4 Max (16 cores), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 166.7% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7473X is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M4 Max (16 cores) in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7473X is a server/workstation processor while Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7473X and Apple M4 Max (16 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7473X
EPYC 7473X
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
M4 Max (16 cores)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 6 votes

Rate EPYC 7473X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Max (16 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7473X or Apple M4 Max (16 cores), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.