Xeon E7430 vs EPYC 7452
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 243 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 7.48 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 7.12 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2019−2020) | Dunnington (2008) |
| Release date | 7 August 2019 (6 years ago) | 15 September 2008 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,025 | $1,391 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of EPYC 7452 and Xeon E7430: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.13 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.35 GHz | 0.13 GHz |
| Multiplier | 23.5 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 3 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | 503 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 64 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 1,900 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.9V-1.45V |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7452 and Xeon E7430 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 4 |
| Socket | TR4 | PGA604 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 90 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7452 and Xeon E7430. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| FSB parity | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC 7452 and Xeon E7430 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7452 and Xeon E7430 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7452 and Xeon E7430. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR2, DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.763 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 August 2019 | 15 September 2008 |
| Physical cores | 32 | 4 |
| Threads | 64 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 90 Watt |
EPYC 7452 has an age advantage of 10 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.
Xeon E7430, on the other hand, has 72% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7452 and Intel Xeon E7430. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
