Xeon Gold 6330N vs EPYC 7451

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7451
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
16.72
Xeon Gold 6330N
2021
28 cores / 56 threads, 165 Watt
23.51
+40.6%

Xeon Gold 6330N outperforms EPYC 7451 by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7451 and Xeon Gold 6330N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking358196
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.0818.57
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)no data
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)1 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,400no data
Current price$2768 (1.2x MSRP)$2197

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6330N has 793% better value for money than EPYC 7451.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7451 and Xeon Gold 6330N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads4856
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache64 MB (shared)42 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data86 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7451 and Xeon Gold 6330N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7451 and Xeon Gold 6330N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

EPYC 7451 and Xeon Gold 6330N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7451 and Xeon Gold 6330N are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7451 and Xeon Gold 6330N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-2667
Maximum memory size2 TiB6 TB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7451 and Xeon Gold 6330N.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes12864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7451 16.72
Xeon Gold 6330N 23.51
+40.6%

Xeon Gold 6330N outperforms EPYC 7451 by 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7451 25863
Xeon Gold 6330N 36360
+40.6%

Xeon Gold 6330N outperforms EPYC 7451 by 41% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.72 23.51
Recency 29 June 2017 1 April 2021
Physical cores 24 28
Threads 48 56
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 165 Watt

The Xeon Gold 6330N is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7451 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7451 and Xeon Gold 6330N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7451
EPYC 7451
Intel Xeon Gold 6330N
Xeon Gold 6330N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7451 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6330N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7451 or Xeon Gold 6330N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.