EPYC 7413 vs EPYC 7451

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7451
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
16.72
EPYC 7413
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
32.47
+94.2%

EPYC 7413 outperforms EPYC 7451 by an impressive 94% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7451 and EPYC 7413 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking358112
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.0921.69
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Milan (2021)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,400$1,825
Current price$2768 (1.2x MSRP)$1485 (0.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7413 has 938% better value for money than EPYC 7451.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7451 and EPYC 7413 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads4848
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.65 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die size192 mm24x 81 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7451 and EPYC 7413 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketTR4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7451 and EPYC 7413. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7451 and EPYC 7413 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7451 and EPYC 7413. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7451 and EPYC 7413.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7451 16.72
EPYC 7413 32.47
+94.2%

EPYC 7413 outperforms EPYC 7451 by 94% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7451 25863
EPYC 7413 50223
+94.2%

EPYC 7413 outperforms EPYC 7451 by 94% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.72 32.47
Recency 29 June 2017 15 March 2021
Cost $2400 $1825
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

The EPYC 7413 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7451 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7451 and EPYC 7413, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7451
EPYC 7451
AMD EPYC 7413
EPYC 7413

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7451 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 7413 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7451 or EPYC 7413, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.