Ultra 5 236V vs EPYC 7451

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7451
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
16.28
+20.6%
Core Ultra 5 236V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
13.50

EPYC 7451 outperforms Core Ultra 5 236V by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7451 and Core Ultra 5 236V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking409554
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.80no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency8.5174.76
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,400no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7451 and Core Ultra 5 236V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads488
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache96K (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7451 and Core Ultra 5 236V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7451 and Core Ultra 5 236V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7451 and Core Ultra 5 236V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7451 and Core Ultra 5 236V are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7451 and Core Ultra 5 236V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc 130V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7451 and Core Ultra 5 236V.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1284

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.28 13.50
Recency 29 June 2017 24 September 2024
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 48 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 17 Watt

EPYC 7451 has a 20.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

Ultra 5 236V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 958.8% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7451 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 5 236V in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7451 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 5 236V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7451 and Core Ultra 5 236V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7451
EPYC 7451
Intel Core Ultra 5 236V
Core Ultra 5 236V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 7451 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Core Ultra 5 236V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7451 or Core Ultra 5 236V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.