3015Ce vs EPYC 7451

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7451
2017, $2,400
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
15.22
+1168%

EPYC 7451 outperforms 3015Ce by a whopping 1168% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5482584
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.48no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency3.578.44
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Pollock (Zen) (2020)
Release date29 June 2017 (8 years ago)4 August 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,400no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of EPYC 7451 and 3015Ce: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads484
Base clock speed2.3 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.3 GHz
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache96K (per core)192 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7451 and 3015Ce compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4FT5
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7451 and 3015Ce. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7451 and 3015Ce are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7451 and 3015Ce. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7451 and 3015Ce.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7451 15.22
+1168%
3015Ce 1.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7451 26639
+1161%
Samples: 8
3015Ce 2113
Samples: 53

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.22 1.20
Recency 29 June 2017 4 August 2020
Physical cores 24 2
Threads 48 4
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 6 Watt

EPYC 7451 has a 1168% higher aggregate performance score, and 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

3015Ce, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 2900% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 7451 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD 3015Ce in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7451 is a server/workstation processor while 3015Ce is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 5 votes

Rate EPYC 7451 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 23 votes

Rate 3015Ce on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7451 and 3015Ce, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.