GX-210UA vs EPYC 7443P
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 165 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 21.29 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 6.85 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Milan (2021−2023) | Kabini (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 15 March 2021 (4 years ago) | 23 April 2013 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,337 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7443P and GX-210UA basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 48 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.85 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Multiplier | 28.5 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm+ | 28 nm |
| Die size | 4x 81 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 16,600 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7443P and GX-210UA compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | SP3 | FT3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7443P and GX-210UA. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7443P and GX-210UA are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7443P and GX-210UA. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.795 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7443P and GX-210UA.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 15 March 2021 | 23 April 2013 |
| Physical cores | 24 | 2 |
| Threads | 48 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 9 Watt |
EPYC 7443P has an age advantage of 7 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.
GX-210UA, on the other hand, has 2122.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7443P and AMD GX-210UA. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 7443P is a server/workstation processor while GX-210UA is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
