A10-7860K vs EPYC 7443P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7443P
2021, $1,337
24 cores / 48 threads, 200 Watt
32.52
+1677%

EPYC 7443P outperforms A10-7860K by a whopping 1677% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1662237
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.27no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency6.861.19
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Godaveri (2014−2016)
Release date12 January 2021 (5 years ago)2 February 2016 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,337no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7443P and A10-7860K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads484
Base clock speed2.85 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4 GHz
Multiplier28.5no data
L1 cache1536 KB256 KB
L2 cache12 MB4096 KB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm+28 nm
Die size4x 81 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors16,600 million2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7443P and A10-7860K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP3FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7443P and A10-7860K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7443P and A10-7860K are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7443P and A10-7860K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR3-2133
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data8
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data512
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 7443P and A10-7860K integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 7443P and A10-7860K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7443P and A10-7860K.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes12816

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7443P 32.52
+1677%
A10-7860K 1.83

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7443P 56923
+1677%
Samples: 87
A10-7860K 3203
Samples: 514

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7443P 1685
+281%
A10-7860K 442

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7443P 13319
+1114%
A10-7860K 1097

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.52 1.83
Recency 12 January 2021 2 February 2016
Physical cores 24 4
Threads 48 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 7443P has a 1677% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

A10-7860K, on the other hand, has 208% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 7443P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A10-7860K in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7443P is a server/workstation processor while A10-7860K is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 26 votes

Rate EPYC 7443P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 85 votes

Rate A10-7860K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7443P and A10-7860K, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.