Ultra 7 270K Plus vs EPYC 7402P
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 266 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 11.19 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 5.85 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2019−2020) | Arrow Lake Refresh (2026) |
| Release date | 7 August 2019 (6 years ago) | 11 March 2026 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,250 | $299 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7402P and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 48 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.35 GHz | 5.5 GHz |
| Multiplier | 28 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 36 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 14 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | 243 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 3,800 million | 17,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7402P and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | SP3 | 1851 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7402P and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| SIPP | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC 7402P and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7402P and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7402P and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.763 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7402P and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 24 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 August 2019 | 11 March 2026 |
| Threads | 48 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 125 Watt |
EPYC 7402P has 100% more threads.
Ultra 7 270K Plus, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 44% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7402P and Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 7402P is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
