Apple M2 Pro vs EPYC 7402P
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7402P outperforms M2 Pro by an impressive 99% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 253 | 676 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 11.79 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | Apple Apple M-Series |
| Power efficiency | 5.86 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Apple |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | no data |
| Release date | 7 August 2019 (6 years ago) | 17 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,250 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7402P and M2 Pro basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 48 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.424 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.35 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Multiplier | 28 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 3.3 MB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 36 MB |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 24 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3,800 million | 40000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7402P and M2 Pro compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | SP3 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7402P and M2 Pro. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7402P and M2 Pro are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7402P and M2 Pro. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.763 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7402P and M2 Pro.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 24.81 | 12.44 |
| Recency | 7 August 2019 | 17 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 24 | 12 |
| Threads | 48 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm |
EPYC 7402P has a 99.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Apple M2 Pro, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD EPYC 7402P is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M2 Pro in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 7402P is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 Pro is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
