i9-10880H vs EPYC 7402

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7402
2019, $1,783
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
26.29
+223%

EPYC 7402 outperforms Core i9-10880H by a whopping 223% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2401089
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.58no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Comet Lake
Power efficiency6.167.63
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Comet Lake-H (2020)
Release date7 August 2019 (6 years ago)2 April 2020 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,783no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of EPYC 7402 and Core i9-10880H: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads4816
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz5.1 GHz
Multiplier28no data
L1 cache1.5 MB512 KB
L2 cache12 MB2 MB
L3 cache128 MB16 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm14 nm
Die size4x 74 mm2no data
Number of transistors15,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7402 and Core i9-10880H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketSP3FCBGA1440
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7402 and Core i9-10880H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7402 and Core i9-10880H are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7402 and Core i9-10880H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7402 and Core i9-10880H.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7402 26.29
+223%
i9-10880H 8.14

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7402 46012
+223%
Samples: 12
i9-10880H 14240
Samples: 19

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.29 8.14
Recency 7 August 2019 2 April 2020
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 48 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 45 Watt

EPYC 7402 has a 223% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

i9-10880H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 300% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 7402 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i9-10880H in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7402 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-10880H is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 14 votes

Rate EPYC 7402 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 61 votes

Rate Core i9-10880H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7402 and Core i9-10880H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.