Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs EPYC 7401P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7401P
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 155 Watt
15.84
+328%

EPYC 7401P outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G by a whopping 328% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4561598
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.57no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency3.932.40
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date20 June 2017 (8 years ago)30 September 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,075no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7401P and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads484
Base clock speed2 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplier2036
L1 cache2.25 MB384 KB
L2 cache12 MB2 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die size213 mm2209.78 mm2
Number of transistors19200 Million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7401P and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketTR4Socket AM4
Power consumption (TDP)155 W, 170 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7401P and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7401P and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7401P and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-2933
Maximum memory size2 TiB64 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Vega 8

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7401P and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7401P 15.84
+328%
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G 3.70

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7401P Samples: 29 27836
+328%
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G Samples: 193 6498

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.84 3.70
Recency 20 June 2017 30 September 2019
Physical cores 24 4
Threads 48 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 7401P has a 328.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 138.5% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 7401P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7401P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7401P
EPYC 7401P
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 20 votes

Rate EPYC 7401P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 164 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7401P and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.