PRO A10-9700 vs EPYC 7401P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7401P
2017, $1,075
24 cores / 48 threads, 155 Watt
15.90
+672%

EPYC 7401P outperforms PRO A10-9700 by a whopping 672% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5102136
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.60no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency3.951.34
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date20 June 2017 (8 years ago)27 July 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,075no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7401P and PRO A10-9700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads484
Base clock speed2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.8 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache2.25 MBno data
L2 cache12 MB2048 KB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size213 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors19200 Million3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7401P and PRO A10-9700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketTR4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)155 W, 170 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7401P and PRO A10-9700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7401P and PRO A10-9700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7401P and PRO A10-9700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-2400
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Enduro-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 7401P and PRO A10-9700 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 7401P and PRO A10-9700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7401P and PRO A10-9700.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1288

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7401P 15.90
+672%
PRO A10-9700 2.06

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7401P 27836
+672%
Samples: 29
PRO A10-9700 3607
Samples: 61

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.90 2.06
Recency 20 June 2017 27 July 2017
Physical cores 24 4
Threads 48 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 7401P has a 672% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

PRO A10-9700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, and 138% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 7401P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD PRO A10-9700 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7401P is a server/workstation processor while PRO A10-9700 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 21 votes

Rate EPYC 7401P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 14 votes

Rate PRO A10-9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7401P and PRO A10-9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.