EPYC 7713P vs EPYC 7401P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7401P
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 170 Watt
17.97
EPYC 7713P
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
51.12
+184%

EPYC 7713P outperforms EPYC 7401P by a whopping 184% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7401P and EPYC 7713P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking34332
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.767.13
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency10.0021.49
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,075$5,010

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7713P has 50% better value for money than EPYC 7401P.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7401P and EPYC 7713P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads48128
Base clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.68 GHz
Multiplier2020
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die size192 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7401P and EPYC 7713P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketTR4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7401P and EPYC 7713P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7401P and EPYC 7713P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7401P and EPYC 7713P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7401P and EPYC 7713P.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7401P 17.97
EPYC 7713P 51.12
+184%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7401P 28546
EPYC 7713P 81201
+184%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.97 51.12
Recency 29 June 2017 15 March 2021
Physical cores 24 64
Threads 48 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 225 Watt

EPYC 7401P has 32.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7713P, on the other hand, has a 184.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7713P is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7401P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7401P and EPYC 7713P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7401P
EPYC 7401P
AMD EPYC 7713P
EPYC 7713P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 14 votes

Rate EPYC 7401P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 5 votes

Rate EPYC 7713P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7401P or EPYC 7713P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.