Atom Z612 vs EPYC 7401P
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 510 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.60 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 3.95 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Naples (2017−2018) | Lincroft (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 20 June 2017 (8 years ago) | 4 May 2010 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,075 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of EPYC 7401P and Atom Z612: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 48 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 0.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 900 MHz - 1500 MHz (1 core) |
| Bus type | no data | cDMI |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MT/s |
| Multiplier | 20 | 9 |
| L1 cache | 2.25 MB | 56 KB |
| L2 cache | 12 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 65.2526 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 19200 Million | 140 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7401P and Atom Z612 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | TR4 | Intel BGA 518 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 155 W, 170 Watt | 1.3 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7401P and Atom Z612. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7401P and Atom Z612 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7401P and Atom Z612. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR1, DDR2 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | 2 GB |
| Max memory channels | 8 | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 170.671 GB/s | 3.2 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | PowerVR SGX535 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7401P and Atom Z612.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 June 2017 | 4 May 2010 |
| Physical cores | 24 | 1 |
| Threads | 48 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 1 Watt |
EPYC 7401P has an age advantage of 7 years, 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 221% more advanced lithography process.
Atom Z612, on the other hand, has 15400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7401P and Intel Atom Z612. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 7401P is a server/workstation processor while Atom Z612 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
