Athlon 64 FX-70 vs EPYC 7401P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking459not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.57no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency3.93no data
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date29 June 2017 (8 years ago)November 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,075no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7401P and Athlon 64 FX-70 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads482
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.6 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache96K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm90 nm
Die size192 mm2235 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7401P and Athlon 64 FX-70 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketTR4F
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7401P and Athlon 64 FX-70. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7401P and Athlon 64 FX-70 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7401P and Athlon 64 FX-70. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR1
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7401P and Athlon 64 FX-70.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 24 2
Threads 48 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 125 Watt

EPYC 7401P has 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 64 FX-70, on the other hand, has 36% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7401P and AMD Athlon 64 FX-70. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 7401P is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 64 FX-70 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7401P
EPYC 7401P
AMD Athlon 64 FX-70
Athlon 64 FX-70

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 20 votes

Rate EPYC 7401P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Athlon 64 FX-70 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7401P and Athlon 64 FX-70, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.