Ultra 9 386H vs EPYC 7401

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking164not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.23no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency19.78no data
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)no data
Release date29 June 2017 (8 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$1,850no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7401 and Core Ultra 9 386H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads48no data
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.9 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache64 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nmno data
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7401 and Core Ultra 9 386H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4no data
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt + 18 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7401 and Core Ultra 9 386H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7401 and Core Ultra 9 386H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7401 and Core Ultra 9 386H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelno data
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7401 and Core Ultra 9 386H.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 24 16

EPYC 7401 has 50% more physical cores.

We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7401 and Intel Core Ultra 9 386H. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 7401 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 9 386H is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7401
EPYC 7401
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Core Ultra 9 386H

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 11 votes

Rate EPYC 7401 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 9 386H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7401 and Core Ultra 9 386H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.