A6-9500E vs EPYC 7401

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7401
2017, $1,850
24 cores / 48 threads, 170 Watt
31.58
+3058%

EPYC 7401 outperforms A6-9500E by a whopping 3058% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1732732
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.27no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency7.841.21
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date29 June 2017 (8 years ago)27 July 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,850no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of EPYC 7401 and A6-9500E: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads482
Base clock speed2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size192 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7401 and A6-9500E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7401 and A6-9500E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7401 and A6-9500E are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7401 and A6-9500E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-2400
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data4
Enduro-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 7401 and A6-9500E integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 7401 and A6-9500E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7401 and A6-9500E.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1288

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7401 31.58
+3058%
A6-9500E 1.00

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7401 55280
+3127%
A6-9500E 1713
Samples: 13

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.58 1.00
Physical cores 24 2
Threads 48 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 35 Watt

EPYC 7401 has a 3058% higher aggregate performance score, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

A6-9500E, on the other hand, has 386% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 7401 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A6-9500E in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7401 is a server/workstation processor while A6-9500E is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 11 votes

Rate EPYC 7401 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 53 votes

Rate A6-9500E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7401 and A6-9500E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.