EPYC 7513 vs EPYC 73F3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 73F3
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 240 Watt
29.81
EPYC 7513
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
38.33
+28.6%

EPYC 7513 outperforms EPYC 73F3 by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 73F3 and EPYC 7513 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13270
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.5223.91
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameMilan (2021)Milan (2021)
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,521$2,840
Current price$2271 (0.6x MSRP)$1651 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7513 has 91% better value for money than EPYC 73F3.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 73F3 and EPYC 7513 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads3264
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.65 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+7 nm+
Die size8x 81 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors33,200 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 73F3 and EPYC 7513 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP3SP3
Power consumption (TDP)240 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 73F3 and EPYC 7513. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 73F3 and EPYC 7513 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 73F3 and EPYC 7513. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 73F3 and EPYC 7513.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 73F3 29.81
EPYC 7513 38.33
+28.6%

EPYC 7513 outperforms EPYC 73F3 by 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 73F3 46103
EPYC 7513 59285
+28.6%

EPYC 7513 outperforms EPYC 73F3 by 29% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.81 38.33
Physical cores 16 32
Threads 32 64
Cost $3521 $2840
Power consumption (TDP) 240 Watt 200 Watt

The EPYC 7513 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 73F3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 73F3 and EPYC 7513, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 73F3
EPYC 73F3
AMD EPYC 7513
EPYC 7513

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 73F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate EPYC 7513 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 73F3 or EPYC 7513, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.