Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 vs EPYC 7373X

VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7373X and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Architecture codenameMilan-X (2022)Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date22 March 2022 (2 years ago)4 June 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7373X and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads3224
Base clock speed3.05 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache768 MB (shared)36 MB
Chip lithography7 nm3 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2no data
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7373X and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP3no data
Power consumption (TDP)240 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7373X and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXDNA 2 NPU
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7373X and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7373X and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7373X and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 2022 4 June 2024
Physical cores 16 12
Threads 32 24
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 240 Watt 55 Watt

EPYC 7373X has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 336.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7373X and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 7373X is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7373X and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7373X
EPYC 7373X
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 170
Ryzen AI 9 HX 170

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7373X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 7 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7373X or Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.