EPYC 9454P vs EPYC 7373X

VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7373X and EPYC 9454P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated16
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.57
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data19.69
Architecture codenameMilan-X (2022)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date22 March 2022 (2 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,598

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7373X and EPYC 9454P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads3296
Base clock speed3.05 GHz2.75 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.8 GHz
Multiplierno data27.5
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache768 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size8x 81 mm28x 72 mm2
Number of transistors33,200 million52,560 million
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7373X and EPYC 9454P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3SP5
Power consumption (TDP)240 Watt290 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7373X and EPYC 9454P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7373X and EPYC 9454P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7373X and EPYC 9454P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7373X and EPYC 9454P.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 2022 10 November 2022
Physical cores 16 48
Threads 32 96
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 240 Watt 290 Watt

EPYC 7373X has 20.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9454P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7373X and EPYC 9454P. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7373X and EPYC 9454P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7373X
EPYC 7373X
AMD EPYC 9454P
EPYC 9454P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7373X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 10 votes

Rate EPYC 9454P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7373X or EPYC 9454P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.