Core i7-13700K vs EPYC 7373X
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 7373X and Core i7-13700K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | 135 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 63.74 |
Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
Series | no data | Intel Core i7 |
Architecture codename | Milan-X (2022) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
Release date | 22 March 2022 (2 years ago) | 27 September 2022 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $409 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7373X and Core i7-13700K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
Threads | 32 | 24 |
Base clock speed | 3.05 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 4 × 16 GT/s |
Multiplier | no data | 34 |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 768 KB |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 8 MB |
L3 cache | 768 MB (shared) | 6 MB |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
Die size | 8x 81 mm2 | 257 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
Number of transistors | 33,200 million | no data |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7373X and Core i7-13700K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
Socket | SP3 | LGA 1700 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 240 Watt | 125 W, 253 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7373X and Core i7-13700K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7373X and Core i7-13700K are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | no data |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7373X and Core i7-13700K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 89.604 GB/s |
ECC memory support | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7373X and Core i7-13700K.
PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 128 | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 22 March 2022 | 27 September 2022 |
Threads | 32 | 24 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 240 Watt | 125 Watt |
EPYC 7373X has 33.3% more threads.
i7-13700K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 92% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between EPYC 7373X and Core i7-13700K. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 7373X is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-13700K is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7373X and Core i7-13700K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.