Xeon Silver 4214 vs EPYC 7371

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

EPYC 7371
2018
16 cores / 32 threads
20.11
+92.1%
Xeon Silver 4214
2019
12 cores / 24 threads
10.47

EPYC 7371 outperforms Xeon Silver 4214 by 92% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7371 and Xeon Silver 4214 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking245675
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.2812.53
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Xeon Silver
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date16 November 2018 (5 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,550$694
Current price$2738 (1.8x MSRP)$765 (1.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4214 has 193% better value for money than EPYC 7371.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7371 and Xeon Silver 4214 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads3224
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)768 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)12 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)16.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data77 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7371 and Xeon Silver 4214 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketTR4FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7371 and Xeon Silver 4214. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

EPYC 7371 and Xeon Silver 4214 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7371 and Xeon Silver 4214 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7371 and Xeon Silver 4214. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-2400
Maximum memory size2 TiB1 TB
Max memory channels86
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s115.212 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7371 and Xeon Silver 4214.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes12848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7371 20.11
+92.1%
Xeon Silver 4214 10.47

EPYC 7371 outperforms Xeon Silver 4214 by 92% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7371 31094
+92.1%
Xeon Silver 4214 16190

EPYC 7371 outperforms Xeon Silver 4214 by 92% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.11 10.47
Recency 16 November 2018 2 April 2019
Physical cores 16 12
Threads 32 24
Cost $1550 $694
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 85 Watt

The EPYC 7371 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4214 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7371 and Xeon Silver 4214, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7371
EPYC 7371
Intel Xeon Silver 4214
Xeon Silver 4214

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 11 votes

Rate EPYC 7371 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 13 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4214 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7371 or Xeon Silver 4214, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.