Ryzen Z2 Extreme vs EPYC 7371

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7371
2018, $1,550
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
16.77
+22.3%

EPYC 7371 outperforms Ryzen Z2 Extreme by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking436595
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.12no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)
Power efficiency4.1938.83
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025)
Release date16 November 2018 (7 years ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,550no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7371 and Ryzen Z2 Extreme basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz5 GHz
Multiplier31no data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)8 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7371 and Ryzen Z2 Extreme compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4FP8
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7371 and Ryzen Z2 Extreme. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7371 and Ryzen Z2 Extreme are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7371 and Ryzen Z2 Extreme. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 890M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7371 and Ryzen Z2 Extreme.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7371 16.77
+22.3%
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 13.71

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7371 29573
+22.3%
Samples: 12
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 24177
Samples: 7

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.77 13.71
Recency 16 November 2018 6 January 2025
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 15 Watt

EPYC 7371 has a 22.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen Z2 Extreme, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 1033.3% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 7371 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7371 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Z2 Extreme is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7371
EPYC 7371
AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme
Ryzen Z2 Extreme

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 12 votes

Rate EPYC 7371 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 57 votes

Rate Ryzen Z2 Extreme on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7371 and Ryzen Z2 Extreme, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.