EPYC 9135 vs EPYC 7371

VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7371 and EPYC 9135 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking292not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.39no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency10.79no data
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Turin (2024)
Release date13 November 2018 (6 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,550$1,214

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7371 and EPYC 9135 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3232
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4.3 GHz
Multiplier31no data
L1 cache1.5 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size213 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors19200 Million16,630 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7371 and EPYC 9135 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketTR4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7371 and EPYC 9135. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7371 and EPYC 9135 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7371 and EPYC 9135. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7371 and EPYC 9135.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 November 2018 10 October 2024
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm

EPYC 9135 has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7371 and EPYC 9135. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7371 and EPYC 9135, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7371
EPYC 7371
AMD EPYC 9135
EPYC 9135

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 11 votes

Rate EPYC 7371 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9135 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7371 or EPYC 9135, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.