Intel Xeon Gold 6346 vs AMD EPYC 7352

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

EPYC 7352
26.11
+6.3%

EPYC 7352 outperforms Xeon Gold 6346 by 6% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing EPYC 7352 and Xeon Gold 6346 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking154173
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money24.7918.28
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date7 August 2019 (4 years old)6 April 2021 (2 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,350no data
Current price$830 (0.6x MSRP)$2311
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7352 has 36% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6346.

Technical specs

EPYC 7352 and Xeon Gold 6346 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads4832
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data78 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7352 and Xeon Gold 6346 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketTR4FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7352 and Xeon Gold 6346. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

EPYC 7352 and Xeon Gold 6346 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7352 and Xeon Gold 6346 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7352 and Xeon Gold 6346. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory supportno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7352 and Xeon Gold 6346.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7352 26.11
+6.3%
Xeon Gold 6346 24.56

EPYC 7352 outperforms Xeon Gold 6346 by 6% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7352 40096
+6.3%
Xeon Gold 6346 37722

EPYC 7352 outperforms Xeon Gold 6346 by 6% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 26.11 24.56
Recency 7 August 2019 6 April 2021
Physical cores 24 16
Threads 48 32
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 205 Watt

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7352 and Xeon Gold 6346. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7352 and Xeon Gold 6346, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7352
EPYC 7352
Intel Xeon Gold 6346
Xeon Gold 6346

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate AMD EPYC 7352 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 10 votes

Rate Intel Xeon Gold 6346 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7352 or Xeon Gold 6346, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.