i7-13790F vs EPYC 7351P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7351P
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
14.76
Core i7-13790F
2023
16 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
25.36
+71.8%

Core i7-13790F outperforms EPYC 7351P by an impressive 72% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking500231
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.4757.91
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency3.6816.55
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date29 June 2017 (8 years ago)10 February 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$750$441

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-13790F has 1196% better value for money than EPYC 7351P.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7351P and Core i7-13790F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3224
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz5.2 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache96K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)33 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2257 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7351P and Core i7-13790F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketTR41700
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7351P and Core i7-13790F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7351P and Core i7-13790F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7351P and Core i7-13790F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7351P and Core i7-13790F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7351P and Core i7-13790F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7351P 14.76
i7-13790F 25.36
+71.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7351P 26042
i7-13790F 44737
+71.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.76 25.36
Recency 29 June 2017 10 February 2023
Threads 32 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 7351P has 33.3% more threads.

i7-13790F, on the other hand, has a 71.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 161.5% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core i7-13790F is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD EPYC 7351P in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7351P is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-13790F is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7351P
EPYC 7351P
Intel Core i7-13790F
Core i7-13790F

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 15 votes

Rate EPYC 7351P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 63 votes

Rate Core i7-13790F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7351P and Core i7-13790F, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.