A10-8700P vs EPYC 7351P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7351P
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
16.15
+1045%
A10-8700P
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.41

EPYC 7351P outperforms A10-8700P by a whopping 1045% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7351P and A10-8700P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4092198
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.46no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Carrizo
Power efficiency8.993.81
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)3 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$750no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7351P and A10-8700P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads324
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7351P and A10-8700P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketTR4FP4
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt12 - 35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7351P and A10-8700P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataHSA 1.0
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX+AVX
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
HSA-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7351P and A10-8700P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7351P and A10-8700P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR3-2133
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R6 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 7351P and A10-8700P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 7351P and A10-8700P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7351P and A10-8700P.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7351P 16.15
+1045%
A10-8700P 1.41

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7351P 25657
+1043%
A10-8700P 2245

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7351P 630
+24.5%
A10-8700P 506

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7351P 4738
+320%
A10-8700P 1129

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.15 1.41
Recency 29 June 2017 3 June 2015
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 32 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 12 Watt

EPYC 7351P has a 1045.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

A10-8700P, on the other hand, has 1316.7% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7351P is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-8700P in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7351P is a server/workstation processor while A10-8700P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7351P and A10-8700P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7351P
EPYC 7351P
AMD A10-8700P
A10-8700P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 14 votes

Rate EPYC 7351P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 119 votes

Rate A10-8700P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7351P or A10-8700P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.