Ryzen 7 5800X vs EPYC 7351

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7351
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
14.62
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
17.52
+19.8%

Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms EPYC 7351 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7351 and Ryzen 7 5800X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking489361
Place by popularitynot in top-10049
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.2224.51
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency8.1415.80
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)5 November 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,100$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 5800X has 661% better value for money than EPYC 7351.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7351 and Ryzen 7 5800X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz4.7 GHz
Multiplier2438
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)32 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size192 mm22 x 80.7 sq. mm; I/O = 125 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7351 and Ryzen 7 5800X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7351 and Ryzen 7 5800X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7351 and Ryzen 7 5800X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7351 and Ryzen 7 5800X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size2 TiB128 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7351 and Ryzen 7 5800X.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7351 14.62
Ryzen 7 5800X 17.52
+19.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7351 23226
Ryzen 7 5800X 27829
+19.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.62 17.52
Recency 29 June 2017 5 November 2020
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 105 Watt

EPYC 7351 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 7 5800X, on the other hand, has a 19.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 61.9% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 5800X is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7351 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7351 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 5800X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7351 and Ryzen 7 5800X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7351
EPYC 7351
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate EPYC 7351 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 5982 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5800X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7351 or Ryzen 7 5800X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.