Ryzen AI 9 465 vs EPYC 7313P
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7313P outperforms Ryzen AI 9 465 by an impressive 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 293 | 671 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 18.61 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 6.30 | 19.67 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Milan (2021−2023) | Gorgon Point (2026) |
| Release date | 15 March 2021 (4 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $913 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7313P and Ryzen AI 9 465 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Multiplier | 30 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm+ | no data |
| Die size | 4x 81 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 16,600 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7313P and Ryzen AI 9 465 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | SP3 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7313P and Ryzen AI 9 465. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7313P and Ryzen AI 9 465 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7313P and Ryzen AI 9 465. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.795 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7313P and Ryzen AI 9 465.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 23.11 | 13.04 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 10 |
| Threads | 32 | 20 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 28 Watt |
EPYC 7313P has a 77.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 60% more physical cores and 60% more threads.
Ryzen AI 9 465, on the other hand, has 453.6% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 7313P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 7313P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 9 465 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
