Core Ultra 9 185H vs EPYC 7313P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7313P
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
27.18
+45.6%
Core Ultra 9 185H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 45 Watt
18.67

EPYC 7313P outperforms Ultra 9 185H by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7313P and Core Ultra 9 185H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking159290
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.88no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Meteor Lake-H
Architecture codenameMilan (2021)Meteor Lake-H
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$913no data
Current price$1253 (1.4x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7313P and Core Ultra 9 185H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3222
Base clock speed3 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+7 nm
Die size4x 81 mm2no data
Number of transistors16,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7313P and Core Ultra 9 185H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP3FCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7313P and Core Ultra 9 185H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPPno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

EPYC 7313P and Core Ultra 9 185H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7313P and Core Ultra 9 185H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7313P and Core Ultra 9 185H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiB96 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel® Arc™ graphics
Quick Sync Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data2.35 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 7313P and Core Ultra 9 185H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by EPYC 7313P and Core Ultra 9 185H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 7313P and Core Ultra 9 185H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7313P and Core Ultra 9 185H.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes12828
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7313P 27.18
+45.6%
Ultra 9 185H 18.67

EPYC 7313P outperforms Core Ultra 9 185H by 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7313P 42032
+45.5%
Ultra 9 185H 28881

EPYC 7313P outperforms Core Ultra 9 185H by 46% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

EPYC 7313P 1358
Ultra 9 185H 2261
+66.5%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms EPYC 7313P by 66% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

EPYC 7313P 9404
Ultra 9 185H 12117
+28.8%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms EPYC 7313P by 29% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.18 18.67
Recency 15 March 2021 14 December 2023
Threads 32 22
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 45 Watt

The EPYC 7313P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 9 185H in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7313P is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 9 185H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7313P and Core Ultra 9 185H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7313P
EPYC 7313P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Core Ultra 9 185H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7313P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 187 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 185H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7313P or Core Ultra 9 185H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.