9 273PQE vs EPYC 7313P
Aggregate performance score
Core 9 273PQE outperforms EPYC 7313P by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 318 | 259 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 10.27 | 26.76 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 6.30 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Milan (2021−2023) | Bartlett Lake (2025−2026) |
| Release date | 15 March 2021 (5 years ago) | 9 March 2026 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $913 | $589 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
9 273PQE has 161% better value for money than EPYC 7313P.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of EPYC 7313P and Core 9 273PQE: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 5.9 GHz |
| Multiplier | 30 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 36 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm+ | 10 nm |
| Die size | 4x 81 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 16,600 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7313P and Core 9 273PQE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | SP3 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7313P and Core 9 273PQE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
EPYC 7313P and Core 9 273PQE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7313P and Core 9 273PQE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7313P and Core 9 273PQE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.795 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7313P and Core 9 273PQE.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 23.38 | 26.65 |
| Recency | 15 March 2021 | 9 March 2026 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 12 |
| Threads | 32 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 125 Watt |
EPYC 7313P has 33% more physical cores and 33% more threads, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.
9 273PQE, on the other hand, has a 14% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 24% lower power consumption.
The Intel Core 9 273PQE is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD EPYC 7313P in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 7313P is a server/workstation processor while Core 9 273PQE is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
