Xeon Gold 6338 vs EPYC 7313

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7313
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
25.27
+15.6%

EPYC 7313 outperforms Xeon Gold 6338 by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7313 and Xeon Gold 6338 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking188238
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.35no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)no data
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)1 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,083no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7313 and Xeon Gold 6338 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads3264
Base clock speed3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache1 MBno data
L2 cache8 MBno data
L3 cache128 MB (shared)48 MB
Chip lithography7 nm+10 nm
Die size4x 81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data81 °C
Number of transistors16,600 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7313 and Xeon Gold 6338 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP3FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7313 and Xeon Gold 6338. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Statusno dataLaunched
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7313 and Xeon Gold 6338 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7313 and Xeon Gold 6338 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7313 and Xeon Gold 6338. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7313 and Xeon Gold 6338.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes12864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7313 25.27
+15.6%
Xeon Gold 6338 21.86

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7313 39091
+15.6%
Xeon Gold 6338 33814

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.27 21.86
Recency 12 January 2021 1 April 2021
Physical cores 16 32
Threads 32 64
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 205 Watt

EPYC 7313 has a 15.6% higher aggregate performance score, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 32.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6338, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The EPYC 7313 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6338 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7313 and Xeon Gold 6338, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7313
EPYC 7313
Intel Xeon Gold 6338
Xeon Gold 6338

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 30 votes

Rate EPYC 7313 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 16 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6338 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7313 or Xeon Gold 6338, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.