Xeon Silver 4316 vs EPYC 7302P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7302P
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
21.08
+4%
Xeon Silver 4316
2021
20 cores / 40 threads, 150 Watt
20.26

EPYC 7302P outperforms Xeon Silver 4316 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7302P and Xeon Silver 4316 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking238250
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.9024.84
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date7 August 2019 (4 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$825no data
Current price$792 (1x MSRP)$1335

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4316 has 39% better value for money than EPYC 7302P.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7302P and Xeon Silver 4316 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads3240
Base clock speed3 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data84 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data84 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7302P and Xeon Silver 4316 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketTR4FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7302P and Xeon Silver 4316. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

EPYC 7302P and Xeon Silver 4316 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7302P and Xeon Silver 4316 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7302P and Xeon Silver 4316. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-2667
Maximum memory size4 TiB6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory supportno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7302P and Xeon Silver 4316.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7302P 21.08
+4%
Xeon Silver 4316 20.26

EPYC 7302P outperforms Xeon Silver 4316 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7302P 32612
+4.1%
Xeon Silver 4316 31341

EPYC 7302P outperforms Xeon Silver 4316 by 4% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.08 20.26
Recency 7 August 2019 6 April 2021
Physical cores 16 20
Threads 32 40
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 150 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 7302P and Xeon Silver 4316.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7302P and Xeon Silver 4316, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7302P
EPYC 7302P
Intel Xeon Silver 4316
Xeon Silver 4316

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7302P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 21 vote

Rate Xeon Silver 4316 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7302P or Xeon Silver 4316, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.