Xeon Gold 5318H vs EPYC 7302P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7302P
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
20.57
+11.5%
Xeon Gold 5318H
2021
18 cores / 36 threads, 150 Watt
18.45

EPYC 7302P outperforms Xeon Gold 5318H by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7302P and Xeon Gold 5318H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking273325
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.40no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency12.5611.64
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Cooper Lake-SP (2021)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$825no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7302P and Xeon Gold 5318H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads3236
Base clock speed3 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.8 GHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)24.75 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7302P and Xeon Gold 5318H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)4
SocketTR4FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7302P and Xeon Gold 5318H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7302P and Xeon Gold 5318H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7302P and Xeon Gold 5318H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7302P and Xeon Gold 5318H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4 RDIMM
Maximum memory size4 TiB1.12 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7302P and Xeon Gold 5318H.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7302P 20.57
+11.5%
Xeon Gold 5318H 18.45

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7302P 32669
+11.5%
Xeon Gold 5318H 29301

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.57 18.45
Recency 7 August 2019 6 April 2021
Physical cores 16 18
Threads 32 36
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 150 Watt

EPYC 7302P has a 11.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon Gold 5318H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 12.5% more physical cores and 12.5% more threads, and 3.3% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7302P is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 5318H in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7302P and Xeon Gold 5318H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7302P
EPYC 7302P
Intel Xeon Gold 5318H
Xeon Gold 5318H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7302P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5318H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7302P or Xeon Gold 5318H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.