Ryzen 9 6900HX vs EPYC 7302P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7302P
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
21.36
+31.5%

EPYC 7302P outperforms Ryzen 9 6900HX by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7302P and Ryzen 9 6900HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking262427
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.89no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$825no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7302P and Ryzen 9 6900HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed3 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.9 GHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache1 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm6 nm
Die size192 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7302P and Ryzen 9 6900HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketTR4FP7
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7302P and Ryzen 9 6900HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7302P and Ryzen 9 6900HX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7302P and Ryzen 9 6900HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 680M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7302P and Ryzen 9 6900HX.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7302P 21.36
+31.5%
Ryzen 9 6900HX 16.24

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7302P 32626
+31.5%
Ryzen 9 6900HX 24802

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7302P 1192
Ryzen 9 6900HX 2010
+68.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7302P 8185
Ryzen 9 6900HX 9736
+18.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.36 16.24
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 45 Watt

EPYC 7302P has a 31.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 9 6900HX, on the other hand, has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 244.4% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7302P is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 6900HX in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7302P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 6900HX is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7302P and Ryzen 9 6900HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7302P
EPYC 7302P
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
Ryzen 9 6900HX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7302P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 432 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 6900HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7302P or Ryzen 9 6900HX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.