Processor N100 vs EPYC 7302P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7302P
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
20.57
+775%
Processor N100
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
2.35

EPYC 7302P outperforms Processor N100 by a whopping 775% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7302P and Processor N100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2671788
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.54no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency12.5637.07
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$825$128

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7302P and Processor N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads324
Base clock speed3 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache1 MB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7302P and Processor N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketTR4Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7302P and Processor N100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 7302P and Processor N100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7302P and Processor N100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7302P and Processor N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 750 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7302P and Processor N100.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.57 2.35
Recency 7 August 2019 3 January 2023
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 32 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 6 Watt

EPYC 7302P has a 775.3% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Processor N100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 2483.3% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7302P is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N100 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7302P is a server/workstation processor while Processor N100 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7302P and Processor N100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7302P
EPYC 7302P
Intel Processor N100
Processor N100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7302P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1276 votes

Rate Processor N100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7302P or Processor N100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.