Xeon Silver 4210R vs EPYC 7301

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7301
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
9.44
Xeon Silver 4210R
2020
10 cores / 20 threads, 100 Watt
9.52
+0.8%

Xeon Silver 4210R outperforms EPYC 7301 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7301 and Xeon Silver 4210R processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking810802
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.0027.57
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Xeon Silver
Power efficiency5.269.01
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)24 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$825$511

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4210R has 1279% better value for money than EPYC 7301.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7301 and Xeon Silver 4210R basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads3220
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2224
L1 cache96K (per core)640 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)10 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)13.75 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data84 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7301 and Xeon Silver 4210R compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7301 and Xeon Silver 4210R. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7301 and Xeon Silver 4210R technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7301 and Xeon Silver 4210R are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7301 and Xeon Silver 4210R. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-2400
Maximum memory size2 TiB1 TB
Max memory channels86
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s115.212 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7301 and Xeon Silver 4210R.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes12848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7301 9.44
Xeon Silver 4210R 9.52
+0.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7301 14991
Xeon Silver 4210R 15118
+0.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.44 9.52
Recency 29 June 2017 24 February 2020
Physical cores 16 10
Threads 32 20
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 100 Watt

EPYC 7301 has 60% more physical cores and 60% more threads.

Xeon Silver 4210R, on the other hand, has a 0.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 70% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 7301 and Xeon Silver 4210R.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7301 and Xeon Silver 4210R, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7301
EPYC 7301
Intel Xeon Silver 4210R
Xeon Silver 4210R

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 22 votes

Rate EPYC 7301 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 38 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4210R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7301 or Xeon Silver 4210R, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.