Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs EPYC 7301

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7301
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
9.44
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2024
8 cores / 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c threads, 28 Watt
13.94
+47.7%

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 outperforms EPYC 7301 by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7301 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking810532
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.00no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency5.2647.12
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$825no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7301 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Base clock speed2.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data54 MHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache64 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7301 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4FP8
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7301 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7301 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7301 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 880M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7301 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7301 9.44
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 13.94
+47.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7301 14991
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 22145
+47.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.44 13.94
Recency 29 June 2017 1 October 2024
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 28 Watt

EPYC 7301 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has a 47.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 507.1% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7301 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7301 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7301 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7301
EPYC 7301
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 22 votes

Rate EPYC 7301 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7301 or Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.