Ryzen 7 2700X vs EPYC 7301

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7301
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
9.82
Ryzen 7 2700X
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
11.47
+16.8%

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms EPYC 7301 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7301 and Ryzen 7 2700X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking791687
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.229.89
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency5.269.94
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)13 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$825$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 2700X has 345% better value for money than EPYC 7301.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7301 and Ryzen 7 2700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2237
L1 cache96K (per core)768 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die size192 mm2213 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million4800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7301 and Ryzen 7 2700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketTR4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7301 and Ryzen 7 2700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7301 and Ryzen 7 2700X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7301 and Ryzen 7 2700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size2 TiB64 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7301 and Ryzen 7 2700X.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7301 9.82
Ryzen 7 2700X 11.47
+16.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7301 14991
Ryzen 7 2700X 17518
+16.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.82 11.47
Recency 29 June 2017 13 April 2018
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 105 Watt

EPYC 7301 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 7 2700X, on the other hand, has a 16.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 61.9% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 2700X is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7301 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7301 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 2700X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7301 and Ryzen 7 2700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7301
EPYC 7301
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Ryzen 7 2700X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 22 votes

Rate EPYC 7301 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2847 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7301 or Ryzen 7 2700X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.