5 205H vs EPYC 7301

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1121not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.84no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Raptor Lake-H
Power efficiency2.13no data
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Raptor Lake-H Refresh (2026)
Release date29 June 2017 (9 years ago)7 June 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$825no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of EPYC 7301 and Core 5 205H: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3212
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz4.8 GHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache96K (per core)704 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)8 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)12 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7301 and Core 5 205H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4BGA1744
Power consumption (TDP)170 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7301 and Core 5 205H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7301 and Core 5 205H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7301 and Core 5 205H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelno data
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7301 and Core 5 205H.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 June 2017 7 June 2026
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

EPYC 7301 has 100% more physical cores and 167% more threads.

5 205H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7301 and Intel Core 5 205H. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 7301 is a server/workstation processor while Core 5 205H is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 22 votes

Rate EPYC 7301 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 5 205H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7301 and Core 5 205H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.