Ryzen 9 7950X vs EPYC 72F3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 72F3
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 180 Watt
17.16
Ryzen 9 7950X
2022
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
39.47
+130%

Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms EPYC 72F3 by a whopping 130% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 72F3 and Ryzen 9 7950X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking36966
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.40no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency9.0221.97
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Raphael (Zen 4) (2022)
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,468no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 72F3 and Ryzen 9 7950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed3.7 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz5.7 GHz
Multiplier37no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+5 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2CCD = 2x 70 sq. mm, I/O = 122 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistors33,200 million13140 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 72F3 and Ryzen 9 7950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3AM5
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 72F3 and Ryzen 9 7950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataCCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm, 0.650 - 1.475 V
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 72F3 and Ryzen 9 7950X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 72F3 and Ryzen 9 7950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 72F3 and Ryzen 9 7950X.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes12824

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 72F3 17.16
Ryzen 9 7950X 39.47
+130%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 72F3 27252
Ryzen 9 7950X 62704
+130%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.16 39.47
Recency 15 March 2021 27 September 2022
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 170 Watt

Ryzen 9 7950X has a 130% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 5.9% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 7950X is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 72F3 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 72F3 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 7950X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 72F3 and Ryzen 9 7950X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 72F3
EPYC 72F3
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
Ryzen 9 7950X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 6 votes

Rate EPYC 72F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1606 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 72F3 or Ryzen 9 7950X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.