Ryzen 5 PRO 220 vs EPYC 7282

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7282
2019, $650
16 cores / 32 threads, 120 Watt
17.14
+52.2%

EPYC 7282 outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 220 by an impressive 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking427785
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.40no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Power efficiency15.34no data
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025)
Release date7 August 2019 (6 years ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$650no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7282 and Ryzen 5 PRO 220 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads3212
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.9 GHz
Multiplier28no data
L1 cache1 MB384 KB
L2 cache8 MB6 MB
L3 cache64 MB16 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm4 nm
Die size2x 74 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors7,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7282 and Ryzen 5 PRO 220 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketSP3FP7/FP7r2
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt6 MB + 16 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7282 and Ryzen 5 PRO 220. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataAES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7282 and Ryzen 5 PRO 220 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7282 and Ryzen 5 PRO 220. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 740M ( - 2800 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7282 and Ryzen 5 PRO 220.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7282 17.14
+52.2%
Ryzen 5 PRO 220 11.26

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7282 30289
+52.3%
Samples: 34
Ryzen 5 PRO 220 19889
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.14 11.26
Recency 7 August 2019 6 January 2025
Physical cores 16 6
Threads 32 12
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 6 Watt

EPYC 7282 has a 52.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 220, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 1900% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 7282 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 220 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7282 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7282
EPYC 7282
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Ryzen 5 PRO 220

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 52 votes

Rate EPYC 7282 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7282 and Ryzen 5 PRO 220, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.